From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 3314E3861027; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:39:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3314E3861027
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596213591;
 bh=v5ucqLViTa71zQ0evw6HO2vimGS/8uFClWNbrMXfEjE=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=McSCo0vRS820OOviPSJXN9jFPOrpD5QPhQvEj9CsACT0zbWhUQNl1YfPG2i7S4+SQ
 6rP5Skhrg4MFAuJDFf4H49BAdtGy4GT7QQuOHFAfnEosK+kbVMsPQpwf5UwYxqYWpl
 +UOE0IsNTAXTQpdOaIzPNppli6h533FBNMRzsJ5s=
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96003] [11 Regression] spurious -Wnonnull calling a member
 on the result of static_cast
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:39:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96003-4-2tmKH6WYka@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96003-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96003-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:39:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96003

--- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #8)
> Also, the "'this' pointer null" error wording is not very clear. Should it
> be "'this' pointer is null"? Or "'this' pointer may be null"?

I agree that the text doesn't read quite right.  It's just a slight rewordi=
ng
of the generic "argument 1 null..." so both might read better if rephrased =
as
you suggest.=