From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id ED5E6385EC57; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:27:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED5E6385EC57
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595359650;
 bh=WnmXkbuKoKQOj20MEEWJ7F5P7WeqGO1aYYTRzHK5Tro=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=EZ+SZpQnoI6cWOYKmCoYHm7nvAbnnbQsy8bn7lpapN7lSk/u5jzXAnbktvxn/cxw+
 t8svS1CT1i0bQ2i0mbYBEvMAgQMG9oBVMaUws4dGEqyu4rYAGP0c9IY+/6J+ZOzX9H
 C/9dgyFX7A7BlWJw7YdKHV97eIbQhnVrWOE+S7fc=
From: "sbergman at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96003] [11 Regression] spurious -Wnonnull calling a member
 on the result of static_cast
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:27:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sbergman at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96003-4-UOrKJiQXkL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96003-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96003-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:27:31 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96003

--- Comment #11 from Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #10)
> Patch for the static cast:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550231.html

LibreOffice runs into the same issue, but while the above patch fixes my fi=
rst
reduced test case

> $ cat test1.cc
> struct S1 {};
> struct S2: S1 {};
> struct S3: S1 {};
> struct S4: S2, S3 { void f(); };
> void g(S3 * p) { static_cast<S4 *>(p)->f(); }

it does not fix the second

> $ cat test2.cc
> struct S1 { virtual ~S1(); };
> struct S2 { virtual ~S2(); };
> struct S3: S1, S2 { void f() const; };
> void g(S2 * p) { static_cast<S3 const *>(p)->f(); }

> $ g++ -Wnonnull -fsyntax-only test2.cc
> test2.cc: In function =E2=80=98void g(S2*)=E2=80=99:
> test2.cc:4:48: warning: =E2=80=98this=E2=80=99 pointer null [-Wnonnull]
>     4 | void g(S2 * p) { static_cast<S3 const *>(p)->f(); }
>       |                                                ^
> test2.cc:3:26: note: in a call to non-static member function =E2=80=98voi=
d S3::f() const=E2=80=99
>     3 | struct S3: S1, S2 { void f() const; };
>       |                          ^=