From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B9A6E384640F; Thu,  2 Jul 2020 17:16:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B9A6E384640F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1593710217;
 bh=wM5Yaws5rqpESEU4OuOWNLgdeb0YnLfmsw0V5ksXXUI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=IqpTXakTXDALZGPL3kz1Wi48DFtaYIPkxoAF+bfJ+QF7mtHO6bOIr9uKyYoMAUEuJ
 rF/8NSO9QbAJlMDgjot2qDEyPd2mNWGLSwgSEqYPBbaBT095vlRIu0MBKPgEIceGK9
 gc8c4pjClVy2+JF8FzWQ5tcZKDPr3iJW1VfDXsEw=
From: "slyfox at inbox dot ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python
 on hppa
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:16:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: slyfox at inbox dot ru
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96015-4-DSxeMwp4W5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96015-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96015-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:16:57 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96015

--- Comment #21 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at inbox dot ru> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #18)
> If the control flow goes through .L12:
>=20
> .L12:
>         b .L3    ; return 0; (not interesting, fall through)
> 	ldi 1,%r28
>=20
> the return value will be 1 since ldi is in the delay slot of the branch.
>=20
> What happens if you compile with -O2 -fno-delayed-branch instead?

Oh, -fno-delayed-branch makes test magically pass! Attaching both bad.S and
good.S for comparison.=