public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "martin.schlipf at damnthespam dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96018] Optimization issue with external HDF5 library
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:03:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-96018-4-JN92U1T6rl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-96018-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018

--- Comment #4 from martin.schlipf at damnthespam dot com ---
Hdf5 doesn't have native support for complex datatypes, so we convert to real
and write that it is a complex as an attribute. If you replace the conversion
logic by an array instead of a pointer

allocate(real_array(2,size(array,1),size(array,2),size(array,3)))
reshape(transfer(array, real_array), shape(real_array))

it doesn't alert the behavior.

I agree that the error code should be checked and in fact, I already started a
merge request for that particular part. But for this bug report, I need to
leave it away, because otherwise the compiler does the right thing.

Finally, I reproduced it with gfortran 9.3.0 + hdf 1.12.0 and gfortran 10.0 +
hdf 1.10.4. With older versions of gfortran 7.3.0 it does not appear.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-01 11:39 [Bug fortran/96018] New: " martin.schlipf at damnthespam dot com
2020-07-01 12:01 ` [Bug fortran/96018] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-01 12:07 ` martin.schlipf at damnthespam dot com
2020-07-01 12:24 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-01 13:03 ` martin.schlipf at damnthespam dot com [this message]
2020-07-01 19:31 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-02  6:49 ` martin.schlipf at damnthespam dot com
2020-07-03  6:10 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-05 17:54 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-06 11:39 ` martin.schlipf at damnthespam dot com
2020-07-06 13:31 ` [Bug fortran/96018] [9/10/11 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-07-06 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-06 15:01 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-06 15:17 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-09 20:52 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-12  9:34 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-19 11:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 15:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 18:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-23 18:28 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-96018-4-JN92U1T6rl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).