public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96045] [11 Regression] Wrong line and column diagnostic message in a class template instantiation
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 22:26:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-96045-4-SLYw2QOkjJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-96045-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96045

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell <nathan@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:745f22096c3a2a5e63d5bab1fb079e2c437cf9bc

commit r11-6325-g745f22096c3a2a5e63d5bab1fb079e2c437cf9bc
Author: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 14:17:17 2020 -0800

    c++: EOF location [PR 96045]

    Setting the EOF token location to be the start of a line just after
    the ending newline is not most helpful.  While that location is
    probably the right place to report preprocessing and lexing issues,
    when parsing, the location just after the last token is better.  That
    way we get to point at some actual text.  Setting the location from
    the previous token has the advantage over just setting the location to
    be the end of the final line, in that any ending comments do not get
    considered, which I think is better.

            PR c++/96045
            gcc/cp/
            * parser.c (cp_lexer_new_main): Adjust EOF token location.
            gcc/testsuite/
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/pr96045-1.C: New.
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/pr96045-2.C: New.
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/pr96045-3.C: New.
            * c-c++-common/goacc/pr79428-1.c: Adjust EOF diagnostic location.
            * c-c++-common/gomp/pr79428-2.c: Likewise
            * c-c++-common/raw-string-6.c: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype63.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-64.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68726.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr78341.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr65202.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr65340.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68578.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction44.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/unclosed-extern-c.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/unclosed-function.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/unclosed-namespace.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/unclosed-struct.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/ext/pr84598.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/other/switch4.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/attr4.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/cond4.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash10.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash18.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash27.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash34.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash35.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash52.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash59.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash61.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/crash67.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/error14.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/error56.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/invalid1.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/parameter-declaration-1.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/parser-pr28152-2.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/parser-pr28152.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/pr68722.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/parse/pr96258.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/pr46852.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/pr46868.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/template/crash115.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/template/crash43.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/template/crash90.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/template/error-recovery1.C: Likewise
            * g++.dg/template/error57.C: Likewise
            * g++.old-deja/g++.other/crash31.C: Likewise

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-23 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03 11:05 [Bug c++/96045] New: " haoxintu at gmail dot com
2020-07-08 21:54 ` [Bug c++/96045] [11 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-08 21:57 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-16 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-22 20:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-22 21:00 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-23 22:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-12-26 19:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 16:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-96045-4-SLYw2QOkjJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).