From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 220453858D35; Sun,  2 Aug 2020 12:27:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 220453858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596371271;
 bh=14wqWTqgTnRossDnfvJGXadBhzLAUyw0h/zAUQWF8cs=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=KlBopEJCePdZoObz5MS4kUiXm/5+zF2CTBZuL7qXkGEa28HaSd30d5PaQEt5PWOBx
 SeT3FjbdNM5YJK/cuubA2pRSS9dpKcU910fHv/S2Im18rBIpj/FhG7dCTrbCB18lcx
 m3k7o4cpuLxK6FKKdXCOnZIFABEuUBXHdATCKpo0=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96102] ICE in check_host_association, at
 fortran/resolve.c:5994
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:27:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-96102-4-ia1KHa0Vg8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96102-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96102-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:27:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96102

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |pault at gcc dot gn=
u.org

--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 48983
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D48983&action=3Dedit
Proposed patch for the PR

Steve's proposed patch caused regressions in host_assoc_function_[1,2].f90.

This one regtests OK.

I don't know if the gcc_assert needs to be retained or not. I will go throu=
gh
all the possible cases that can arrive here. If the only one is caught by t=
he
condition above, then the assert can go as can the second and third lines in
the condition.

Paul=