From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1BB0B3857010; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:19:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1BB0B3857010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594153150; bh=ORfe7qa4dWxsnYaU30FrBL3qw54hRIv8U4wPFGKxVRo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=e4EtlmMVBGTLsZqjo/wAC+inxuKicbVShgmhION22VuTr0C7TW4K8ISRB+iqs7dNM +gSqN6dn1gRdhC0LKH6e4EHwBiBrELzgSW2bX5nOgzgFsldgWX3LgrisCNpF+edlv4 NECx8AVpMjawv5lGy7SPp0hfPFRD+Vr7nQk3FJhQ= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/96103] Unclear diagnostic for a function return with "decltype(auto)" Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:19:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:19:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96103 Marek Polacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2020-07-07 CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Confirmed, we should tweak cp_parser_decltype to give a better error.=