public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:45:52 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-96109-4-JABcZxDdiw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-96109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth <ro@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96b63fa255e343bb9b3e7f77302213a91ce96293 commit r14-9427-g96b63fa255e343bb9b3e7f77302213a91ce96293 Author: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> Date: Mon Mar 11 15:45:17 2024 +0100 testsuite: vect: Require vect_perm in several tests [PR114071, PR113557, PR96109] Several vectorization tests FAIL on 32 and 64-bit Solaris/SPARC: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr67790.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr67790.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-48.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-48.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-1.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-1.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-2.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-2.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-7.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-7.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-7.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-7.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-8.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-8.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-multi-peel-gaps.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED" FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-multi-peel-gaps.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED" The dumps show variations of /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c:24:17: note: ==> examining statement: _4 = a[i_19].f2; /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c:24:17: missed: unsupported vect permute { 1 0 3 2 5 4 } /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c:24:17: missed: unsupported load permutation /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c:27:17: missed: not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: _4 = a[i_19].f2; so I think the tests should require vect_perm. This is what this patch does Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11. 2024-02-22 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> gcc/testsuite: PR tree-optimization/114071 * gcc.dg/vect/pr37027.c: Require vect_perm. * gcc.dg/vect/pr67790.c: Likewise. * gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-1.c: Likewise. * gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-2.c: Likewise. * gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-7.c: Likewise. * gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-8.c: Likewise. PR tree-optimization/113557 * gcc.dg/vect/vect-multi-peel-gaps.c (scan-tree-dump): Also require vect_perm. PR testsuite/96109 * gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c: Require vect_perm. * gcc.dg/vect/slp-48.c: Likewise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 14:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-08 8:51 [Bug testsuite/96109] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-08 8:53 ` [Bug testsuite/96109] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-08 8:53 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-08 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-08 9:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-10 12:26 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-19 9:11 ` [Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-19 9:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-27 11:39 ` [Bug testsuite/96109] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-28 7:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-26 10:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-26 10:30 ` [Bug testsuite/96109] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-21 7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-29 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-25 18:09 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2023-08-25 18:10 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2024-02-23 9:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-23 9:37 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-11 14:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-03-11 14:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-96109-4-JABcZxDdiw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).