From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ED414386186A; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:13:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED414386186A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594224826; bh=Pv1V1NTUuS4VS4oKV1Lch+bU0t39sCmvy6/5FVBSGUs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dmVLyNtRD2GPbcypgT0h+2pEKQj1H3+t4QCIoa+hlVnfIQUcs/9Tx5oCfMbb4cc+J 5l+h6CYM311Zhbs5I62LXrjegxOtn6sVY+mpUwr4rTgAxGKv1ntUGBpRy4LcNNjnJf 7K8FfzNvaIwnP37sbRQtgBZOUtNcRvElXR9hk7fQ= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/96120] Ambiguity diagnostic message of "invalid use of type 'void' in parameter declaration" Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:13:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:13:47 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96120 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Haoxin Tu from comment #0) > GCC might emit the ambiguity diagnostic message on it. What does that mean?=