From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F2D2C3857C7C; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 07:30:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F2D2C3857C7C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594366207; bh=+p/gWrGz8BQjvm0kwBPjeWRY6lckOng3ZTMv0RsknIc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jh0P2vjmXSJ6atBqqZUvMzwQh1i+KsWO/iJVrHFwSqJ9yDhEun90U2xeaQdiljmwd GGKualba0JbjAUOmgPsi3g26ObFOy82LdZzqy7oU1XNAwGZ4xB5bz+XOFZFiwxdugt RUdkVnDQymw9xV9yz3VUIuAGbejUCK/01qQgVl5M= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96133] [10/11 Regression] x86-64 gcc 10.1 using -O3 leads to wrong calculation since r10-1882-g831e688af50c5f77 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 07:30:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 07:30:08 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96133 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Ingo Weyrich from comment #7) > Richard, does you last comment mean, you already fixed it?. How can I tes= t? > Maybe using godbolt? >=20 > Ingo Sorry, no - a test is still in development, the last comment meant I mistyp= ed the bug number in an unrelated commit ;)=