public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/96155] New: "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function fails to compile @ 2020-07-10 15:11 r-gcc at mail dot uk 2020-07-10 15:18 ` [Bug c++/96155] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-28 21:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: r-gcc at mail dot uk @ 2020-07-10 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96155 Bug ID: 96155 Summary: "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: r-gcc at mail dot uk Target Milestone: --- This fails to compile on gcc trunk, while the same code compiles fine in clang: constexpr bool foo() { for(int i = 0; i != 5; ++i) { if(i == 3) return false; } throw 5; return true; } this is the message I am getting: error: expression ‘<throw-expression>’ is not a constant expression live example: https://godbolt.org/z/eqqr4f ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/96155] "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function fails to compile 2020-07-10 15:11 [Bug c++/96155] New: "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function fails to compile r-gcc at mail dot uk @ 2020-07-10 15:18 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-28 21:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-10 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96155 Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |rejects-valid Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed| |2020-07-10 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. Doesn't look like a regression. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/96155] "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function fails to compile 2020-07-10 15:11 [Bug c++/96155] New: "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function fails to compile r-gcc at mail dot uk 2020-07-10 15:18 ` [Bug c++/96155] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-28 21:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-28 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96155 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Dup of bug 98672. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98672 *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-28 21:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-07-10 15:11 [Bug c++/96155] New: "throw" that is not executed in constexpr function fails to compile r-gcc at mail dot uk 2020-07-10 15:18 ` [Bug c++/96155] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-28 21:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).