From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BFAA9385383B; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:05:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BFAA9385383B From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/96184] [11/12 Regression] GCC treats "use of local variable with automatic storage from containing function" differently in versions Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:05:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority target_milestone bug_status assigned_to short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:05:02 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96184 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|9.5 |11.0 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gn= u.org Summary|[9/10 Regression] GCC |[11/12 Regression] GCC |treats "use of local |treats "use of local |variable with automatic |variable with automatic |storage from containing |storage from containing |function" differently in |function" differently in |versions |versions --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- I think it's ill-formed, because the use of 'a' is in a function parameter scope, rather than in 'main'. The changes in whether we accepted this testcase were indeed by accident, as the way we handled 'this' injection changed whether parsing_nsdmi() returned true.=