From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6D335383E826; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D335383E826
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1594644084;
 bh=hzGFxvuF5I24s82dazRfxTyQXp1ZUXRl2ncdZVK4PQg=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=CGm2X20Wct4R0GzxH9Ovflc9FgLHljvSkelONWwe4JskBo3McslIB22kXu7mMWgJr
 ZycK7S7uL4l1V3/rVkVeVcOdpEQIBbPRPS26fXcxmvukxMbxuZeOsAAftz5nUNvyFA
 s2mfkSnhofJI3pLp7qusGCsqfnMWpHIX6PAOFzW0=
From: "haoxintu at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96184] New: GCC treats "use of local variable with
 automatic storage from containing function" differently in versions
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: haoxintu at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-96184-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:41:24 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96184

            Bug ID: 96184
           Summary: GCC treats "use of local variable with automatic
                    storage from containing function" differently in
                    versions
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: haoxintu at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Hi, all.

This code, GCC-trunk and other versions (etc., GCC-10) treat it differently.

$cat test.cc
int main(){
    int a  =3D 10;
    int const b =3D 10;
    auto p =3D [ ] () noexcept ( b ? 0 : a =3D b) { return 0;};
    return 0;
}

$g++-trunk -std=3Dc++14 test.cc
//nothing

$g++-10 -std=3Dc++14 test.cc
test.cc: In function =E2=80=98int main()=E2=80=99:
test.cc:4:40: error: use of local variable with automatic storage from
containing function
    4 |     auto p =3D [ ] () noexcept ( b ? 0 : a =3D b) { return 0;};
      |                                        ^
test.cc:2:9: note: =E2=80=98int a=E2=80=99 declared here
    2 |     int a  =3D 10;
      |         ^

I am wondering is this a enhancement of GCC-trunk?=20

I also test this in other GCC versions. Weirdly, only GCC-9 or GCC-10 rejec=
ts
it while other versions from 6.1 to 8.3 (also trunk) accepts it.

I don't know how GCC deals with this case and this also makes me confused.

Thanks,
Haoxin=