From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2332D38618C0; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:32:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2332D38618C0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1594744359;
 bh=FSRyoYpuUZ3fHhbPmFsumadkCiPFlRoSE9cuLWWmSzs=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=MoxW3XXYrFFcAflz5aBJay6ikNzsTyD8ebv1YgaTSEKGRFwNlZSOO3rJI4EDafXMX
 BeuHeMiVHqb/J8gKksgHm0dgWoszc3QOr2g4xQF80vo2yds/QiPt4TMR6e3mrVvyZL
 6Iwlor47yO1thPNcFdiPNKvZKpCeMxE04/HDCr2Q=
From: "wjwray at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96185] Enhancement: Please add a builtin to count bindings
 in [dcl.struct.bind]
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:32:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: wjwray at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96185-4-mWSskdYtBN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96185-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:32:39 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96185

--- Comment #9 from Will Wray <wjwray at gmail dot com> ---
An earlier draft had __builtin_tuple_size as the magic behind the P2141
proposed std::tuple_size automagic generalization to Case 3 class types.

There was opposition to that name because it specifically doesn't apply
to tuples so I left the naming open, suggesting __builtin_binding_count
(and, so, requiring consensus on naming for portability...)=