From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C3C143857C41; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:26:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C3C143857C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595647567;
 bh=I0pJthR8aDYkJE66RQdjCtbDtuFZqKdmNOXqYhSJa5g=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=S86EXqC1vmiCf6JsxTDwj9dCMBD0fconifTp2nC8vzhmWWIqGsNM2x7I+1XM3xvOK
 bMIY9mPTys8P25hs0yVP4ATMPPkLeARaqMd5pIV4r9OJdsiVyz3jQ8sAhvAgAwWqmm
 i0WvWCRWcA7FKlPtYhf/wsWHdlHNc0rIuFftY3AU=
From: "johelegp at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96193] No ADL in dependent call with explicit template
 arguments
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:26:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: johelegp at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_file_loc short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-96193-4-6Oj3kbFBin@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 03:26:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96193

Johel Ernesto Guerrero Pe=C3=B1a <johelegp at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://godbolt.org/z/E64Pb
                   |                            |b
            Summary|No ADL in call with         |No ADL in dependent call
                   |explicit template arguments |with explicit template
                   |within templated hidden     |arguments
                   |friend                      |

--- Comment #4 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Pe=C3=B1a <johelegp at gmail dot=
 com> ---
It actually fails for dependent calls. See https://godbolt.org/z/E64Pbb.
```C++
namespace ns {
  template <class T> struct X { };
  template <class T> constexpr void adl(X<T>) { }
}
template <class V> void f() { adl<int>(ns::X<V>{}); }
void g() { f<int>(); }
```=