From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 967BA388A831; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:28:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 967BA388A831
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1594909683;
 bh=L3ee1mxdHjzI7m7R015ndBPYf7XO9sJU683gwZckpUQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=xQ9jHVVFpUdxrGCA49TovXX445lXftVWvi+sCN4jWyqHmeCBJI9ghW5/+GVZTh3EW
 lEvMGjTY590YBYvXKFCCm4Rlypw6ssreaswtWT9hIe0U6bx7NRuW0CsDRgWRujbMcq
 c6BQ6wjU50mTBEbGp/OZmHHQ6cPXZgnLsHWp6Wq4=
From: "doko at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/96203] [11 Regression] LTO bootstrap with
 --enable-cet is broken
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:28:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: doko at debian dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96203-4-qUwiuYAGmH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96203-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96203-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:28:03 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96203

--- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose <doko at debian dot org> ---
Comment on attachment 48881
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D48881
Something like this

please could you update gcc/doc/invoke.texi?

is error only supposed to be passed in LDFLAGS, not in CFLAGS? What would be
the semantics if error passed in CFLAGS?=