From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AD2AA3851C3E; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:35:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AD2AA3851C3E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1594812928; bh=DgqjjanpRQ+y5sFloupXwVw9aXmHxgwBbXiyJ45+9fE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fMZ1WKz9ilE9F48PiNPMw30rN6iW/KI7X10PruwJeCsQF+Ita2tvBmiwf5Mks/1FM IfWGmYtHHGS6yfeD7WvLleYHvNxVuDqeT4KxbmTxcD9cBZbT19+hVC+YiTxPdUiBwZ UaNfUTuRktgV0DylmykMBLfgfMlAy6VKDGcSI3cY= From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/96203] [11 Regression] LTO bootstrap with --enable-cet is broken Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:35:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:35:28 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96203 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Arguably the simplest solution is to demote the error to a warning, > --enable-cet > is supposed to only enable CET instrumentation of (part of) the runtime. = If > we want to keep the error we'd need to build several variants of libiberty > (in this case). Not sure why libiberty was CET enabled in the first plac= e - > is it used in target libraries? No. It is for liblto_plugin.so. See PR 94739.=