public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/96224] New: -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names @ 2020-07-16 19:34 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-16 19:34 ` [Bug fortran/96224] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-16 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224 Bug ID: 96224 Summary: -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Consider the following code: module mod contains subroutine init end subroutine end module module init use mod, only : mod_init => init implicit none contains subroutine sub call mod_init call init contains subroutine init end subroutine end subroutine end module Compiling the above (after applying my patch for PR89574; otherwise module init needs to be renamed) leads to: init () { } init () { } sub () { static void init (void); init (); init (); } Grepping the resulting assembler suggests that the proper calls are generated: % grep call foo.s call __mod_MOD_init call init.0 So this is likely only a cosmetic problem, although an annoying one. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/96224] -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names 2020-07-16 19:34 [Bug fortran/96224] New: -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-16 19:34 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-23 14:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2020-07-23 18:45 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-16 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P5 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/96224] -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names 2020-07-16 19:34 [Bug fortran/96224] New: -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-16 19:34 ` [Bug fortran/96224] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 14:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2020-07-23 18:45 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-23 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2020-07-23 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- Could you be more explicit about what you would like? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/96224] -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names 2020-07-16 19:34 [Bug fortran/96224] New: -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-16 19:34 ` [Bug fortran/96224] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-23 14:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2020-07-23 18:45 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-23 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Could you be more explicit about what you would like? How about: mod::init () or mod.init () to indicate the relevant namespace. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-23 18:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-07-16 19:34 [Bug fortran/96224] New: -fdump-tree-original could use more sophisticated or mangled procedure names anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-16 19:34 ` [Bug fortran/96224] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-23 14:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2020-07-23 18:45 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).