public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug analyzer/96228] New: -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls
@ 2020-07-16 22:05 renat at idrisov dot info
2020-07-16 22:18 ` [Bug middle-end/96228] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: renat at idrisov dot info @ 2020-07-16 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96228
Bug ID: 96228
Summary: -Wstack-usage does not understand constant
__builtin_alloca calls
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renat at idrisov dot info
Target Milestone: ---
Hi All,
when compiling the following piece of code:
```
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
char *a = __builtin_alloca(4);
a[0] = 0;
printf("%c", a[0]);
return 0;
}
```
with:
$ gcc -Wstack-usage=2048 stack.c
gives:
stack.c:3:5: warning: stack usage might be unbounded [-Wstack-usage=]
3 | int main(void) {
which is too pessimistic on `__builtin_alloca` behavior.
No warning when "char *a = __builtin_alloca(4);" is changed to "char a[4];"
Thank you!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/96228] -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls
2020-07-16 22:05 [Bug analyzer/96228] New: -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls renat at idrisov dot info
@ 2020-07-16 22:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-16 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-17 8:51 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-16 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96228
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|analyzer |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
-Wstack-usage is done on the RTL level, this means __builtin_alloca with a
constant is not converted into always allocation. Usually because of
__builtin_alloca can be conditional.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/96228] -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls
2020-07-16 22:05 [Bug analyzer/96228] New: -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls renat at idrisov dot info
2020-07-16 22:18 ` [Bug middle-end/96228] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-16 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-17 8:51 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-16 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96228
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh wait this is at -O0. Well the warning is correct and won't be fixed really.
-Wstack-usage is done on the RTL level so it can take into account register
spilling and all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/96228] -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls
2020-07-16 22:05 [Bug analyzer/96228] New: -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls renat at idrisov dot info
2020-07-16 22:18 ` [Bug middle-end/96228] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-16 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-17 8:51 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-17 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96228
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The reason is rather that no flow analysis is performed by -Wstack-usage, which
means that it cannot distinguish:
int main(void) {
char *a = __builtin_alloca(4);
a[0] = 0;
__builtin_printf("%c", a[0]);
return 0;
}
from
int main(void) {
while (1) {
char *a = __builtin_alloca(4);
a[0] = 0;
__builtin_printf("%c", a[0]);
}
return 0;
}
so it assumes the worst.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-17 8:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-16 22:05 [Bug analyzer/96228] New: -Wstack-usage does not understand constant __builtin_alloca calls renat at idrisov dot info
2020-07-16 22:18 ` [Bug middle-end/96228] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-16 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-17 8:51 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).