From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 22083386100C; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 22083386100C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1595984316; bh=dkESerM+YiyHmCUEEQAt9UJmYN1Pgb63xYo/DgoV6dQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QoukwXl+KHttKGGesYUkMXq07+6EEGv2JVLIkDGDkBA65O98rUS04XPKvApsvkxdU Rkqbnfc0XJUsC32pmt1lpKgU7qLPReA1FFvXBMjIhytoYjlJkmIZiOe+i3nUESb/K6 0Xc9zzt/P/cVEKhxzJSMscvc6qC/VXxQ13E3BvL0= From: "suochenyao at 163 dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/96235] Segmentation fault with "-Og -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce -finline-small-functions -fipa-sra" Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: suochenyao at 163 dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:58:36 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96235 --- Comment #9 from suochenyao at 163 dot com -= -- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #8) > It is clearly a duplicate of PR 93385. >=20 > What was the reason to switch off DCE in the first place? Was it just me= ant > as a stress test for the compiler? >=20 > I'll try to come up with somewhat less controversial patch for the proble= m. >=20 > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93385 *** Ummm, yes, this is just a stress test. And I get many, similar to this case. Because there is generally no reason to switch off it.=