From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id DA5F93857C45; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:41:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA5F93857C45
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595360517;
 bh=rDauHpQH3ZLY4srD5sGxaZuem6Qa+zP3SoYECI04okI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=aFdCWHMiwvzw91Xue9Yzycrv7/Hh5X2/f2pWoiWZvvt0EhlL7Qipon1jfc3OyEtTo
 XE+h9XcXd5IHooylXi7O7p37zTGxVgsPCF3b6M25gxHIqH3ETTtgG5M9P3V9kpUm6M
 X6BnZ3tZ+jCwPPMDs/l7OJH5FA5G7JOnEMKgtwKM=
From: "jvdelisle at charter dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index
 in DO CONCURRENT
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:41:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at charter dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96255-4-IDP5fRy2Zs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:41:58 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96255

--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> This is related to PR78219.
>=20
> If someone takes up the challenge, then this show accept only
> standard conforming type specs.  That is, INTEGER*4 should be
> rejected.  This means one should use the method introduced in
> array.c(gfc_match_array_constructor) for code to match
> a type spec in an array constructor.  Looks like a copy and
> paste with an additional check for INTEGER.

Agree 200%, tired of people implementing the bad.=