From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5223B3865C2D; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:44:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5223B3865C2D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595360656;
 bh=jSmuVqwI6LRgIGQI8JXhiUp7FW3N/bgjW5uYPI2dJgk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=bCWBL9DXn4vXLyiajyyp3+kC8MjLC5S+QQbvuu3qsK4CBgENWWyvk3vBfBViLciJt
 P/pi/Qhsg6RX2UR77sb5Prrh0mGSbVIut7494tZhGTFIwbJa5snvWO/ovEuNSwca++
 oXAOdslt1912UX1zxVkvkNPkUvI8JoaGeZZq76b4=
From: "jvdelisle at charter dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index
 in DO CONCURRENT
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:44:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at charter dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96255-4-QQy91W4ljw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:44:16 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96255

--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> This issue depends on the fix for FORALL.  In gfc_match_do in the concurr=
ent
> section, one gets to=20
>=20
>       m =3D match_forall_header (&head, &mask);
>=20
> to match the control portion of the statement.

Although we need to support forall, it is interesting that the standards
committe i going to deprecate it, if they have not done so already. Not
encouraged to be used for sure. Also they will be adding features to DO
CONCUURENT which look useful to me.=