From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 8A7F63858D38; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 05:53:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8A7F63858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595310832;
 bh=Qy01cuw4udd3zFPBk0DUZLGkO8V31I91eekb2Wx2lkU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=iERAUHbOAej6lRoetJiOZeYUIFzU8YiWCDq9Uuo0GT4XLxqAaAG78jeeDwap4PDXw
 t/dm3lqy7p2GwMocvrEbs0LKA93sfMNqtOY3RdkXjRsDEwKJYrN3MO09rJ/6QYN7qh
 iYgoQhz2pWK4VQEK8JNzC32eg1v+uvikIOIaz2MQ=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96255] [F2018] Implement optional type spec for index
 in DO CONCURRENT
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 05:53:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: dependson priority
Message-ID: <bug-96255-4-iy7Nk3qAHe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 05:53:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96255

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |78219
           Priority|P3                          |P4

--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This issue depends on the fix for FORALL.  In gfc_match_do in the concurrent
section, one gets to=20

      m =3D match_forall_header (&head, &mask);

to match the control portion of the statement.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D78219
[Bug 78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header=