From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 71EAD3857C73; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:47:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 71EAD3857C73
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595292460;
 bh=yfXxnbUp/nzzKx/nXn79avCo/aZnzr6tejtHErTKQf4=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=RLUfmZkTYUBQBzOYikjLIwxxPUreqIlT/TOoCQn/654ILJ/ufYOs9t4+siLJ4NjDX
 NUusoU0/FgVo8708Lgsm/MUFyfBjmQy9xjmeJBIYcGnV3BtsaWNK+dBJ7q9U/j2MSR
 5o5mXIIi5/g6As9Zs3NEVTJTrZCebfOZXpQ1LFms=
From: "jvdelisle at charter dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96255] New: [F2018] Implement option type spec for
 index DO CONCURRENT
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:47:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at charter dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-96255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 00:47:40 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96255

            Bug ID: 96255
           Summary: [F2018] Implement option type spec for index DO
                    CONCURRENT
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jvdelisle at charter dot net
  Target Milestone: ---

F2018 provides for an optional type spec in the DO CONCURRENT construct:

R1125 concurrent-header is ( [ integer-type-spec :: ] concurrent-control-li=
st [
, scalar-mask-expr ] )

There is a constraint that it must be of type integer. This construct allow=
s it
to be declared locally to its block.

program looper
   implicit none

   !integer i

   do concurrent (integer :: i=3D1:10)
     print *, i
   end do

end program looper

$ gfc -c looper.f03=20
looper.f03:6:19:

    6 |    do concurrent (integer :: i=3D1:10)
      |                   1
Error: Syntax error in DO statement at (1)
looper.f03:8:6:

    8 |    end do
      |      1
Error: Expecting END PROGRAM statement at (1)
looper.f03:7:15:

    7 |      print *, i
      |               1
Error: Symbol =E2=80=98i=E2=80=99 at (1) has no IMPLICIT type=