public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96305] not detecting widen multiple after a widen multiply with shift
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:39:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-96305-4-FSPYmZ9I2D@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-96305-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96305

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Unnecessary signed x        |not detecting widen
                   |unsigned multiplication     |multiple after a widen
                   |with squares of signed      |multiply with shift
                   |variables                   |
             Target|arm-*-*                     |arm-*-*, aarch64-*-*
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-09-27
          Component|target                      |tree-optimization

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is a gimple level issue really.

We are able to figure out one widen multiple with shift but not the second one:
  _10 = a_2(D) w* a_2(D);
  _11 = _10 >> 32;
  _3 = (long long int) b_4(D);
  _6 = _3 * _11;
  _7 = _6 >> 32;
  _8 = (int) _7;

You can also see the issue on aarch64 too.


If we do this:
inline int hmull(int a, int b) {
    return ((long long)a * b) >> 32;
}

int compute(int a, int b) {
    int t = hmull(a,a);
    asm("":"+r"(t));
    return hmull(t, b);
}
------- CUT ----
On aarch64 we get:
        smull   x0, w0, w0
        asr     x2, x0, 32
        smull   x0, w1, w2
        lsr     x0, x0, 32
        ret

which is exactly what we want.
And on arm we get:
        smull   r3, r0, r0, r0
        smull   r1, r0, r1, r0
        bx      lr

Gimple level:
  _11 = a_2(D) w* a_2(D);
  _12 = _11 >> 32;
  _13 = (int) _12;
  __asm__("" : "=r" t_4 : "0" _13);
  _7 = b_5(D) w* t_4;
  _8 = _7 >> 32;
  _9 = (int) _8;

Notice w* there :).

Note the inline-asm helps even clang too.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-27  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24  3:22 [Bug c/96305] New: Unnecessary signed x unsigned multiplication with squares or signed variables petr at nejedli dot cz
2020-07-24  3:35 ` [Bug target/96305] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-24  8:46 ` [Bug target/96305] Unnecessary signed x unsigned multiplication with squares of " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-27  7:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-96305-4-FSPYmZ9I2D@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).