From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 00F6E388E803; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:51:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 00F6E388E803 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1595605882; bh=6GhtqylkGd2odQ/37Lo6vIbCQodOvgML8juMyNHxKFI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RCmdA0lU7f/ajoT8fwrcML1DYOKd3HwPWRVrJtMrJ1lSgQHBhLUhXIQiQVA4XW/j7 mCwR3Xn82ntFTkRpXK6GENtAqiPX75ehXEBmHxXAc01YSbdCZq4U51F8Y5Pmha0hlh 2eUF5sEImYAeUBemFQTiMh2Z+DdKQbNKZvphyz9o= From: "ams at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/96306] gcn libgomp build broken after "libomp: Add omp_depend_kind to omp_lib.{f90,h}" Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:51:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc, openmp X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ams at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:51:22 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96306 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Stubbs --- I'm loath to enable TImode if it's going to ICE all over the place, and I c= an't just drop everything else and implement working TImode unless there's an ea= sy solution. It's always been on the nice-to-have list, but never high priorit= y. Aside from the OpenMP spec, is there any reason why this can't be implement= ed as some kind of aggregate type? At least for now?=