From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A80D4384BC21; Tue,  4 Aug 2020 01:53:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A80D4384BC21
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596506007;
 bh=KI/c9IkFwW6rH0KT3XcMa4K8uBv+UPNbsIY4y69Jdhw=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ta38RH2Cq29LdO+3fpKEviW9ydbr9wC6JnRs4CWypL5o3fURGG0icAmD5uJO1n93c
 dUBbYdU+2SBD4+fSToUIk9UbsgzHlpcjxq1v/yYeOzyYunCAYfYh5ngMnCpTs8pcUI
 GnL1UK3zLU8G4Fqf0qBaVugmeZCHEr6nOamzrR/s=
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length
 dummy argument character array
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 01:53:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96320-4-Hstsv1HrVS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96320-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96320-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 01:53:27 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96320

--- Comment #22 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> =
---
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 11:45:20PM +0000, damian at sourceryinstitute dot o=
rg
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96320
>=20
> --- Comment #21 from Damian Rouson <damian at sourceryinstitute dot org> =
---
> Now that the patch fixing this PR has been committed to the trunk, should=
 it be
> marked as "Resolved" instead of "Assigned?"
>=20

Depends on if someone (whomever committed the patch) is
going to backport it to 9 and 10 branch.=