From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2534B3858D38; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:43:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2534B3858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1595796197;
 bh=5u5cyZr0+plg9v48hKxLkZuDORDaDnD4zEQ8prTQgAI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=VAXfoHUJTQEYskGdPT92OiUpPoVCdwEvZ1oY9mObNPmq21GIrAajZBdoRSI7jYuSm
 xAmnmQndytelLlKHGCNzN+VgRx3TyLKuBHjjscDoUrlTJhcTHlAB04ggxArbkDmHfn
 rLX//xs2xevTGYtTym05XYkshmGAUHldpM/2JVyY=
From: "chilikin.k at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96325] Invalid call of a type-bound procedure is accepted
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:43:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chilikin.k at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96325-4-PXptRSIM5H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:43:17 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96325

--- Comment #2 from Kirill Chilikin <chilikin.k at gmail dot com> ---
Yes, there is no type-bound procedure really, and, yes, there is a bug in t=
he
code (intentionally: it was called for the wrong variable, which is removed=
 for
the test case). The module M2 indeed does not use anything from M1 (due to
simplification of the real code). And, yes, the gfortran should tell that t=
his
statement is not classifiable - 8.3.0 does this, but 10.2.0 successfully
compiles the code without reporting any error.=