From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3DD9D3858D35; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:29:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3DD9D3858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1596443350; bh=r7eu53P7O11taLxU7Iire9qtNvgIuDKUllgg5kLB/jQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vMZTsJZMM2fGarV+SM9Cfl2Ev22bhSC/oHKzRndqgr7mxfnkoYXmb6KKoxm+Yo8a2 KL9i+m4DI9DWogRcI7aH1Gk/BQ2DzgO5Aka7OfCeQ8D+l2+aIb9kep74Oh9kQ9q+Ee MdpCyuIBOeQDBtDyACHav90+IV9qup2Cr/COwvyo= From: "paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:29:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:29:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96325 --- Comment #20 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- I got caught out by mime content blocking - trying again. Paul On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 09:26, Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks - this has been pointed out to me already by Dominique d'Humieres. > I'll fix tonight or tomorrow. > > Paul > > > On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 23:46, ro at gcc dot gnu.org < > gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96325 >> >> Rainer Orth changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- >> CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org >> >> --- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth --- >> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #16) >> >> > gcc/testsuite/ >> > PR fortran/96325 >> > * gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90: New test. >> >> The new testcase produces >> >> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 -O0 compilation failed to produce >> executable >> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 -O1 compilation failed to produce >> executable >> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 -O2 compilation failed to produce >> executable >> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer >> -funroll-loops >> -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions compilation failed to produce >> executable >> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 -O3 -g compilation failed to >> produce >> executable >> +UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 -Os compilation failed to produce >> executable >> >> everywhere. It cannot be >> >> ! { dg-do run } >> >> when the compilation is expected to fail. >> >> -- >> You are receiving this mail because: >> You are on the CC list for the bug. > > > > -- > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - > Albert Einstein >=