From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BE51F3851C11; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:34:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE51F3851C11 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1600551285; bh=lD+li2mumNXyiDQQM4cFofWX2OXT3N4rilruJXpqbJA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=U1eo9dYLtUVG8SfujLFhBB32D2lWOZ5yAnJurNTwpwkIqum1tIgx6t6JutBXLclgY DTd5HRw81Au3M0auZKzTGo81hxUuHXWg6YhjsUaW9K4GLWewLL+aSNadDnyTuMoY8f Y/SuNoEPKat+0yzs4mJ05wwI2tLkHxpCKh2Zi/ek= From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/96337] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2: twice as slow for -O2 -march=x86-64 vs. GCC 9.3/8.4 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:34:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:34:45 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96337 Jan Hubicka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka --- It seems that the benchmarks was flawed. We could reopen if phoronix suceed= s to reporduce them.=