From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2F37A3858D35; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:15:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F37A3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596096926;
 bh=VfotmSWfL+ZbVJDY70xAp7SpzkGyZNCwmlLbh1gFMa0=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=BJ5Z6PwhlbQYPx1bZkHf9QUpefFIKQ6+AGOzLyE4BTJLnzf1oNdK3cXa2BoK1+QVg
 5HxxBsNJHn3iBPYTDLKKnPEZ/mtuXv3SYfAyP6qCAoV5j16x6ZxP+N7Cv1/tOzWQFG
 bmEsxlYgkWhhD0X4Jgc4sGig/vQON0nphdxXzbjI=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96370] ICE with -ffast-math since
 r7-950-g8a85cee26eabf5cf
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:15:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96370-4-GGgbiCpY0j@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96370-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96370-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:15:26 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96370

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, so rewrite_expr_tree isn't prepared to see ops with a three component
"leaf" as try_special_add_to_ops produces which turns { -b, b } into
{ b, b, -1 }.  Instead it recurses into the apperant non-leaf _1 which
is the negate.

  /* Recurse on the LHS of the binary operator, which is guaranteed to
     be the non-leaf side.  */
  tree new_rhs1
    =3D rewrite_expr_tree (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (rhs1), opindex + 1, ops,
                         changed || oe->op !=3D rhs2 || next_changed,
                         false);

But I have a simple fix.=