public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/96374] New: Analyzer erroneously rejects certain diagnostics due to path-feasibility being used on shortest path
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:33:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-96374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374

            Bug ID: 96374
           Summary: Analyzer erroneously rejects certain diagnostics due
                    to path-feasibility being used on shortest path
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: analyzer
          Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Analyzer fails to find a path to the __analyzer_dump_path call:

#include "analyzer-decls.h"

int test_6 (int a, int b)
{
  int problem = 0;
  if (a)
    problem = 1;
  if (b)
    {
      if (!problem)
        problem = 2;
      __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" "" { xfail *-*-* } } */
    }
  return problem;
}

It's rejecting the path due to picking the shortest path, and then a bad
interaction with feasibility-checking.

If feasibility-checking is hacked out, it picks this path (with
-fanalyzer-verbosity=3 for clarity):

  ‘test_6’: events 1-7
    |
    |    6 |   if (a)
    |      |      ^
    |      |      |
    |      |      (1) following ‘false’ branch (when ‘a == 0’)...
    |    7 |     problem = 1;
    |    8 |   if (b)
    |      |      ~
    |      |      |
    |      |      (2) ...to here
    |      |      (3) following ‘true’ branch (when ‘b != 0’)...
    |    9 |     {
    |   10 |       if (!problem)
    |      |          ~
    |      |          |
    |      |          (4) ...to here
    |      |          (5) following ‘false’ branch (when ‘problem != 0’)...
    |   11 |  problem = 2;
    |   12 |       __analyzer_dump_path ();
    |      |       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    |      |       |
    |      |       (6) ...to here
    |      |       (7) here
    |

However, with feasibility-checking, "problem" is still 0 at event (5) (due to
the shortest path skipping the "problem = 1" suite), and hance the "problem !=
0" edge is invalid, and the edge from (5) to (6) is rejected, and the
diagnostic rejected.

We want the shortest feasible path if one exists, and are currently
approximating this by picking the shortest path, and checking if it's feasible,
which isn't the same thing.

Am not sure how best to fix this, but need a PR to mark this as XFAIL.

             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-29 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29 15:33 dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-07-29 15:42 ` [Bug analyzer/96374] " dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-02  2:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-02  2:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26  1:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 22:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 22:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 22:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 23:16 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-96374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).