From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 63F373851C17; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:55:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 63F373851C17
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596138946;
 bh=pw//DXva71Uc2V8T3Jy9RVgEV1p2RGNMx8VvDRI+RNc=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Vq8NXg9W9X7SYNBaNJwDmtJd45okYjYo4F+CFuUcrdVqMly8innoO9YzMy+W70OOY
 1dIsYT2z7bm2XcDIVp8nhgFgBDf35mYHuDlHwLjGoRVwlyKIEUxdccCcrgp4A1jegA
 6gRaD2kFcqEh7CzXHnvIkJKbj19MFhk5kvdsTomk=
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build
 Linux kernel anymore
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:55:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96377-4-yUzO9xKOTi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96377-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:55:46 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96377

--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery=
 dot com> ---
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> IMO process_init_element shouldn't recurse into vector types
> if the initialisation value is also a vector type.  We should
> treat the vector value as initialising the whole type and report
> an error if they're not compatible.

Yes, that seems correct.=