From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AD73E39F4424; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:12:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AD73E39F4424
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96380] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected
 integer_cst, have view_convert_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:12:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96380-4-5t2aiGyX3L@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96380-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96380-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:12:43 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96380

--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:001c63d15e31bc0a1545426d889a0b9f671b4961

commit r12-42-g001c63d15e31bc0a1545426d889a0b9f671b4961
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 20 12:16:04 2021 -0400

    c++: Don't allow defining types in enum-base [PR96380]

    In r11-2064 I made cp_parser_enum_specifier commit to tentative parse
    when seeing a '{'.  That still looks like the correct thing to do, but
    it caused an ICE-on-invalid as well as accepts-invalid.

    When we have something sneaky like this, which is broken in multiple
    ways:

      template <class>
      enum struct c : union enum struct c { e =3D b, f =3D a };

    we parse the "enum struct c" part (that's OK) and then we see that
    we have an enum-base, so we consume ':' and then parse the type-specifi=
er
    that follows the :.  "union enum" is clearly invalid, but we're still
    parsing tentatively and we parse everything up to the ;, and then
    throw away the underlying type.  We parsed everything because we were
    tricked into parsing an enum-specifier in an enum-base of another
    enum-specifier!  Not good.

    Since the grammar for enum-base doesn't allow a defining-type-specifier,
    only a type-specifier, we should set type_definition_forbidden_message
    which fixes all the problems in this PR.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/96380
            * parser.c (cp_parser_enum_specifier): Don't allow defining
            types in enum-base.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/96380
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/enum_base4.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/enum_base5.C: New test.=