From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 40210386102B; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:09:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40210386102B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596100160;
 bh=+XhjY3X333yzEazSxtdzarSp59krBJqkdOd3PUqEP/U=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=g4bVKnEkk68mEmJkNzA5NJkjcBbHVoIweMbbOt0IFaYHAcgRbvzpsWNivtB/KM2PP
 7Ed6YBUUkWqXz5VwmZtZ/TfYMgZdowlekh04QOsSh2uMOPWbR+b8UFbbbnkmOboMAu
 Q4+A93jDwX6U0OEyG+YfiTSz3IlkKBRlh5giXlMA=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/96383] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Full ABI information
 missing missing from GCC compiled C
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:09:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96383-4-3I7FXGZX7H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:09:20 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96383

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Agreed, and we do want the prototypes of used functions even when it costs =
some
increase in debug info size, because without that one say can't easily call=
 in
a debugger those functions unless debug info for the library they are defin=
ed
in is available.
Well, one can always do p ((int (*)(int, int)) foo) (2, 3) instead of just p
foo (2, 3) which gdb disallows because it doesn't have the prototype, but i=
t is
ugly.=