From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4C7D63860C36; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4C7D63860C36
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596185512;
 bh=BufOVAT7qyG9ZyxlhsQAUCsoDPOCDZsZ5S4TxDDUiVk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=D1jczr+40aO23/vqrDWPsFCFnPdRzJFe6OkOBqeRNmN4JKIS/KTZu55NvUlORLFlm
 BrvMoBXRx7B0MymnhII1kLBlF3ynvJvKR8QUak4QeGkjqZZ2s+F58xy5wmGdzV0ZoV
 ieIf2ccQcNx/2oMJi28uGkank1HaFP+5bp3E5IVI=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/96383] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Full ABI information
 missing from GCC compiled C
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96383-4-EkTCWbL0W3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96383

--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> So, for Ada, would you like to preserve current behavior rather than what
> Richard's patch does?
> If so, can't we have a langhook that decides that?
> I don't know much about Ada, but would think that having the prototypes e=
ven
> for functions defined in other shared libraries if they are called or
> referenced in the TU is useful even for Ada.

This yields useless duplication in 99.99% of the cases though and the debug
info is already large enough.  Can't you do this from the front-end instead,
for the c-family of compilers?=