From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 07395385ED4B; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:34:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 07395385ED4B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1596098082; bh=B+5rrOpiK/h810mqLICFkq/A9UnAC+Z5sczaaPKtTWI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DRhIF3JS3yc/MwJ33ZkgTH7EMqlObz1NP2uXAv6F8nFXZvd9fs6f7WUS6vv3LUzts TwytpbYzvreLbfyqv9ySJcloA7JUlpO/M9BngyHyVmt4q18OeboR5cFJWlYpO1RAEm Q80b3kbstfBjPM1b0E2sOE2yaN2x57QmFz7tPDaE= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/96388] scheduling takes forever with -fPIC Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:34:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog, needs-reduction X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:34:42 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96388 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #5) > Started with r9-2469-gc6067437d314f803. Hmm, it probably makes a latent scheduler issue appear. Guess for better analysis we have to trim down the source. Not sure how - maybe automatically with one good and one bad rev. looking for a hundred-fold increase in memory use? Look at the good compile with /usr/bin/time and using the RSS to compute a ulimit -v limit or so.=