From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2126C385840C; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2126C385840C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663950461;
	bh=3p243LUN4/U0PvXKipjZobKlji/1i9SlsBydt4ERgoo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ks0vjYAffk4lvX9jRhFCoCHQIT1s8v7MaVwuCINNXCHCTCo+tmaC4y7rPH1UQmybc
	 1p08yqIrAcJ2Jc0LmYvMNMhNs/yMwvFOYzKtahx/wzdmhVyPUV5YI/TSOqCjeQzfX1
	 qBUvYWCHKYR63i88hGwLd+3afNa5ZgveGymj3pao=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96400] False positive on Wunused-but-set-variable for
 static constexpr var used in lambda
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:27:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-96400-4-yrEoPNUaIM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96400-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96400-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96400

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Changing "[](auto v)" to "[](int *v)" removes the warning. So this is a dup=
 of
bug 88804.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 88804 ***=