From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id F1C523858D35; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:03:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F1C523858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596204236;
 bh=GmaCg5YA+l3VhVeW6b8vwDK57dZszigqYGhzFKAJ95E=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=BYJcvHEMa0NVjbHd8olX/SKsMeX9/spPMqllDmNYHRWndNeOC2wa5QkhJKxy8Bbzc
 RBl7AwUWYYdLErGbvlFD+GIRFo897rQUNFNFzK6+6CywkMUygSDFvY56cmH0FmjdHC
 laJc8Mw3kuZSErhDPQy447Q5q6IMQUCPliPdVzTU=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/96401] [nvptx] Take advantage of subword ld/st/cvt
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:03:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96401-4-aqFoNSGDay@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96401-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96401-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:03:57 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96401

--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Using these changes, I get the desired:
> ...
>         .reg.u32 %r22;
>                 ld.u32  %r22, [%frame];
>                 st.u16  [%frame+4], %r22;
> ...

And to be precise about it, that's starting at fwprop1 that we have two ins=
ns:
...
(insn 5 2 9 2
    (set (reg:SI 22 [ v$0_1 ])
         (mem/v/c:SI (reg/f:DI 2 %frame) [1 v+0 S4 A128]))
    "test.c":7:6 6 {*movsi_insn}
    (nil))
(insn 9 5 0 2
    (set (mem/v/c:HI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 2 %frame)
                              (const_int 4 [0x4])) [2 v2+0 S2 A32])
         (subreg:HI (reg:SI 22 [ v$0_1 ]) 0))
    "test.c":7:6 5 {*movhi_insn}
    (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 23 [ _2 ])
    (nil)))
...

Which is a bit earlier (at 247r) than combine (at 271r).=