From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 40CCD388A834; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:12:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40CCD388A834 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1598609526; bh=6On1Gj1cw7ZnPgUm/t5fsu1DYLcB2U4U5S+6nkk+pZA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z2Hin8mCJKv0jI3Q6AMIEr8Bjoc6uKtnoKM4W6UDVorXD6xrC2dL6eD9GO9TNrJYy hwBg1DiMaIh3SErgYfVwUOQqyYcTkpJxeKFZGudxrf555Nn4wJdrh9TZLk4HWp7RLM G4xaaXptaTp3CeIgfVYnwcR/tKfN6rrAl7mvtOpI= From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96466] [11 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:122 with -Og -finline-functions-called-once -fno-tree-ccp Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:12:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:12:06 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96466 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 28 Aug 2020, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96466 >=20 > --- Comment #7 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- > > As said you have to fake "regular" non-bool comparison operands, > > best based on the COND_EXPRs operand types (using integer types > > of the same size) >=20 > All right, do you mean something like what we do in > tree-vect-generic.c:422-457? Yeah. > Or is the isel pass the right place for the fake comparison? Sure, only ISEL knows that it needs it.=