From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 97E4D3844041; Wed,  5 Aug 2020 15:03:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 97E4D3844041
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596639795;
 bh=eiGNroCuIq4/YJhzFY8CERRSQZTQKXv28eQfeET4mbQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=DLd7jpg6Rx+cNJ4lgpqgKpsT9rBgCSNXOUv5EYxiLKoBQaUfdyFImWxa46C5F1AG6
 H4U8hWKgfm6dpigzrs3gqbZhM/tDKhLexfTH0ozolUgm6OROKM4wuRcrw5ctaYzogi
 5d2Pk7YJqG78hlj6Vz3Eb286acW3gxIW59OiAB3c=
From: "josephcsible at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/96468] Warn when an empty while loop could have been a do-while
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 15:03:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: josephcsible at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96468-4-RMouReQjdG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96468-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96468-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 15:03:15 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96468

--- Comment #3 from Joseph C. Sible <josephcsible at gmail dot com> ---
I didn't intend to restrict this to only volatile control variables. If you
have "_Bool canMoveOn(void);", I'd like "while(!canMoveOn());" in place of
"while(!signaled);" to warn too for the exact same reasons.=