From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E9C10384640E; Thu,  6 Aug 2020 13:53:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9C10384640E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1596721988;
 bh=sYk80/mb9kL10BwTW2T0CXa0mwhHe/Mw4ODTnumRtqc=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=SRET8oysLCd2Ebxs2/nzftxz76ZNFb6lYP+sbI9aCvnmTeXWlIgVo+DDUWf2H/gmR
 eOhy9CQUQoxnhA+uffkIOAbZyh48ICinivGR5UEIZkRhI3SHyWmyuv/WT4vbpX+AzC
 Pp3Lz4NYuaBv/7BBguYjGR8v4aSELFrbPww4H3bk=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96480] [8/9/10 Regression] missed
 optimisation: unnecessary compare in standard algorithms
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:53:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-96480-4-f0kEVmnHp5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96480-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96480-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 13:53:09 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96480

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression]      |[8/9/10 Regression] missed
                   |missed optimisation:        |optimisation: unnecessary
                   |unnecessary compare in      |compare in standard
                   |standard algorithms         |algorithms

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should be fixed on the trunk.
As it is essentially a new optimization, not sure if it is a good idea to
backport it, even when it has been a regression on this testcase.=