public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96481] SLP fail to vectorize VEC_COND_EXPR pattern.
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:26:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-96481-4-WPtL8zzkBT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-96481-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96481
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed| |2020-08-05
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Blocks| |53947
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, this is a known limitation in that for basic-block SLP we do not perform
if-conversion. Instead the basic-block SLP code sees
<bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]:
_1 = *pd_17(D);
_2 = *pc_19(D);
_3 = *pb_20(D);
_4 = *pa_21(D);
if (_3 < _4)
goto <bb 11>; [50.00%]
else
goto <bb 3>; [50.00%]
<bb 11> [local count: 536870912]:
goto <bb 4>; [100.00%]
<bb 3> [local count: 536870913]:
<bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]:
# iftmp.20_23 = PHI <_1(3), _2(11)>
*dst_22(D) = iftmp.20_23;
_5 = MEM[(const unsigned int *)pd_17(D) + 4B];
_6 = MEM[(const unsigned int *)pc_19(D) + 4B];
_7 = MEM[(const unsigned int *)pb_20(D) + 4B];
_8 = MEM[(const unsigned int *)pa_21(D) + 4B];
...
which also rips apart the memory groups (we're slowly relaxing another
limitation that the basic-block SLP code operates on a single basic-block
at a time but for data refs this restriction will prevail).
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
[Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-05 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-05 9:26 [Bug tree-optimization/96481] New: " crazylht at gmail dot com
2020-08-05 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-08-05 11:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/96481] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-05 11:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-08-10 3:20 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-19 23:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-20 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-20 10:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-96481-4-WPtL8zzkBT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).