From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A8CA83861013; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:41:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A8CA83861013 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1597045312; bh=/IwgJeSLreBXoawAEHlAgj/U1CJR+Jd2VJEnNROlNTY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Lw0pa6jbpAI+eqlHLU4vkzHSw9ukJcSMqHVXD9Z9ejXp36rfRSh11mI5XDOA2gZ3h sY2xQcSqLdT/1sMK4RcYpX5I2Xo9GuUXosaTWJZPmiOEAUUYfri06kJ9D35XMEK5jv NNaLr6jCQLJ4X1f3eZJjb4AveKVowhOavDmGywsM= From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/96482] [10/11 Regression] Combination of -finline-small-functions and ipa-cp optimisations causes incorrect values being passed to a function since r279523 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:41:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:41:52 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96482 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- that patch makes ccp to actually use the bit info ipa-cp determines. Before= we used it only to detect pointer alignments if I remember correctly. So it lo= oks like propagation bug uncovered by the change. Smaller testcase or reproduc= tion steps would be indeed welcome.=