From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 489AE386188A; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:45:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 489AE386188A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1597142750; bh=nCy+Hfs+fisrM77TzFbESnwQmmE6HMDtaihLVNErUr0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ffk8L5mwxiY6H1hDDNwY4IEAdBd9zPyXQAhdE+JWGrg4fYa9yRslY4LLuoTCO8xS5 XjHEYlu0df05hPK1I/9unhvpfUf/rxopZZ9oMUpzARQld1mjbzDxMBIf71JSK1fIEc H2y+tLmgJX6o7gvZPUOUCEOKqpX4QdkCUxoB58sY= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96535] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10 ignoring function __attribute__ optimize for all x86 since r11-1019 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:45:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:45:50 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96535 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Martin, you've been fixing Optimization option processing lately, your thou= ghts on that?=