From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B20AC3857C53; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B20AC3857C53 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1597059150; bh=7GIjORMnyaWB3++vR/u+2A6xQtsh9Cs+LIaV96c36Sw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bamFg9KAVEGWsDOtMnfs+5GmVsB+xreUi9qJYqTA2SaYNutftyHf2AZbOIctZLGsW q/AjD9+EpAmLpe1dBLpxGqYtPnsuN0B52KgpM/zrOKbGRl2tJQYpvgh1obMUAnJLBh U2vJ+7CVGdKn880kTcegxczlekYTqSiRBXvKNTOs= From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/96550] gcc is smart in figuring out a non-returning function. Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:32:30 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96550 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Does -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks help?=