From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CC3E13858402; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:26:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CC3E13858402
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710163571;
	bh=i7xthKkiLgde1RxIRt0D/4vJVFFrOvClAPj6SKCz64U=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=iUqQcFQUa0bsQyDMRF9IRzOyHmO1GwJdhzwYBqmm5GFG7fttWUjIkku5I1+DYjjMv
	 c3ipn/u8Knl9UM/WPFl6Eq3f+HU6hl+ZrHf5bq2wEHt8UoC2ex51iXHMb3P0OWkEHL
	 nuRUNoQuFjr65U8ZiG1zmwtmCfABZYyJnDcvIVk4=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/96564] [11/12/13/14 Regression] New maybe use of
 uninitialized variable warning since r11-959
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:26:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96564-4-IR4TrKCBgZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96564-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96564

--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64242.c is one of the testcases FAILing (guess it's
invalid)=