From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B8801385043D; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:45:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8801385043D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1597239935;
 bh=0+R4er2RKN9HKdMg+Sz6yTFNlEPf5fcaVtPRe6wlfls=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=T3xNi8y//79hIDec53+JQEQz+42Emm0wcudysuFOy6/sOaF9hf8+C6C6k814ObdI4
 ImknH4OZjDBnH+wzU20erIc8R1mEY2Moocz8X3Q+fC6dE/RLWqWOZgnHN8/huBcTSh
 C+JdXAt7QvHfZqh9NltVYpDLAZ+nhpTvEWYiSHCk=
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/96582] aarch64:ICE during GIMPLE pass: veclower
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:45:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-96582-4-0rAzlyy1iC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:45:35 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96582

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-08-12

--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.or=
g> ---
We shouldn't need to change the patterns for correctness.  I think
this is a bug in tree-vect-generic, which seems to be using the
byte size * 8 instead of the actual bit precision when generating
the BIT_FIELD_REFs.  This sounds similar to PR94980.

See also PR96366#c1 for more about the SVE_FULL stuff.=