From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id ABB853857C52; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:58:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ABB853857C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1597420724;
 bh=kStP8mZcn74C81OJpyv3GsK06OW7LCDX8EQIhrm0dvk=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=X59+oJV2Kjq9vrmJzvOhxHDkssAVgWfesvzPvAlvn4yOP1tVyPVpTH1QxF0e2Xzt6
 Lld4qVJxr23qqZu4m7I0003J0uyx0hIYL+xHVBfMw0BbJE1Zgysa8EwPEwxc30Wn3/
 x2DI6ZJUehmTFPCGWfqICLbtqXcm5+sFKjt5bqd4=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/96613] SIGFPE on min1() with -ffpe-trap=invalid switch
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:58:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed cc
 priority
Message-ID: <bug-96613-4-oGKBXHBuNx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96613-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96613-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:58:44 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96613

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-08-14
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
           Priority|P3                          |P4

--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Compiling with -fdump-tree-original gives

  integer(kind=3D4) ix;
  real(kind=3D4) x;

  x =3D 7.7643945e+9;
  {
    integer(kind=3D4) M.0;

    M.0 =3D 5000;
    M.0 =3D MIN_EXPR <(integer(kind=3D4)) x, M.0>;
    ix =3D M.0;
  }

The MIN_EXPR is clealy a bad idea as x > huge(1).

The Fortran standard states, that for example,
MIN1(a,b) =3D INT(MIN(a,b)).  I would have expected
to see something along the lines of

  integer(kind=3D4) ix;
  real(kind=3D4) x;

  x =3D 7.7643945e+9;
  {
    real(kind=3D4) M.0;

    M.0 =3D 5000.0;
    M.0 =3D MIN_EXPR <x, M.0>;
    ix =3D (integer(kind=3D4)) M.0;
  }

If this is effecting your code, I suggest changing it to
min1() =3D int(min()) to work around the issue.  This might
get fixed someday when a gfortran contributor has time to
look at it.=