From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A511B3857C47; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:30:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A511B3857C47
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1597674652;
 bh=aIV3solFQUChSYUjHM/ZD6pjKCrJSHLDYr8HPZSS19U=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=cky2F7q/ty7M/DTgAGFspiKvv4zrLA/gv1hRxcTSbv6DbOn+4zw/mAY4BVwGoH/T3
 gqBUIVW48iRAjwTlQjkBvZfF/h9kYpeBuOjvjLL5nwZJRRakMDU/qA5Tum5WMXgA3k
 A2Qh/smRNQbplrNTf19/bKbD+gNow3M9K5Qn3N6g=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11 Regression] std::variant default constructor
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:30:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96645-4-0cdwoJymET@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:30:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96645

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It doesn't compile the code in comment 1. That code doesn't use any standard
library components, so it doesn't make any difference whether you use libc+=
+ or
not.=